ads for 30 min at 4 C. Following a brief centrifugation, the supernatants were removed and incubated with either agarose conjugated anti JAK2 antibody or anti NHE 1 antibody overnight at 4 C. Immunoprecipitates were captured with 50 l of protein A G beads at 4 C for 1 hr. Then, the samples were centrifuged and washed thrice with 1 ml (-)-MK 801 of RIPA buffer, along with the proteins were eluted from the beads using 2x Laemmli sample buffer. Samples subsequently were separated by SDS Page and transferred to PVDF membrane. Blots were probed with anti calmodulin antibody , and, to ensure equal NHE 1 and Jak 2 precipitation from the samples, with NHE 1 monoclonal antibody or Jak 2 antiserum .
For phosphotyrosine immunoprecipitation experiments, quiescent podocytes grown onto 100 mm collagen coated tissue culture dishes were pretreated with AG 490 , or with AG 1478 or car for 30 min, then stimulated with 10 ng ml EGF or car for 5 min and lysed in 0.5 ml 100 mm dish of RIPA buffer . Cell (-)-MK 801 lysates were precleared by incubating with protein A agarose bead slurry for 30 min at 4 C. Precleared lysates were incubated with monoclonal antiphosphotyrosine antibody conjugated to protein A agarose overnight at 4 C. The agarose beads were collected by centrifugation, washed twice with RIPA buffer and when with PBS, resuspended in 2x Laemmli sample buffer, boiled for 5 min, and subjected to SDS Page and subsequent immunoblot analyses with polyclonal antiphosphotyrosine, anti EGFR, anti Jak2, or with monoclonal anti CaM antibodies . Statistical Analysis Data were analyzed by paired, two tailed Student’s t test and analysis of variance using GraphPad Statistics Software program.
P values 0.05 were considered BI-1356 significant. Final results Immunohistochemical confirmation of podocyte differentiation Podocytes were stained for WT 1 and synaptopodin. Undifferentiated podocytes did not stain for synaptopodin ; nonetheless, the cells did stain for WT 1 . Differentiated podocytes stained for synaptopodin and WT 1 . The results in the staining confirm that in our hands, the cultured podocytes showed hallmarks of differentiation. EGFR mRNAs are expressed in podocytes Epidermal growth factor receptors constitute a family of four prototypical receptor tyrosine kinases . EGF receptor subunits dimerize upon ligand binding, resulting in the formation of activated receptors. We determined which EGFR subunit mRNAs were expressed in podocytes using RT PCR.
Undifferentiated podocytes expressed the HSP mRNAs for EGFR ErbB1, Neu HER2, ErbB3, and ErbB4 . Differentiated podocytes expressed the mRNAs for EGFR ErbB1, Erb3, and ErbB4. Neu HER2 mRNA was detectable at extremely minute levels in differentiated podocytes . EGF induces concentration dependent increases in ECAR Possessing established that podocytes express EGFR mRNAs, we next determined regardless of whether the cells expressed functional EGFR. We measured EGF induced increases in extracellular acidification rates using microphysiometry below stop flow conditions. Figure 2B shows that EGF improved proton efflux inside a concentration dependent manner, confirming the presence of functional EGFR in differentiated podocytes. We next sought to figure out the nature in the proton efflux pathway activated by EGF.
Mainly because EGF has been shown to stimulate sodium proton exchangers in fibroblasts, esophageal epithelia and chondrocytes , we studied the expression of mRNAs encoding plasma membrane localized sodium proton exchangers NHE 1, NHE 2, NHE 3, and NHE 4. Figure 3A shows that differentiated podocytes express mRNA for NHE 1 and NHE BI-1356 2, with all the levels of NHE 1 mRNA predominating. Undifferentiated (-)-MK 801 podocytes express only the mRNA for NHE 1 . The mRNAs for NHE 3 and NHE 4 were not detected in undifferentiated or differentiated podocytes. Therefore, it can be attainable that EGFmediated proton efflux from differentiated podocytes requires NHE 1 or NHE 2.
In order to test the involvement of sodium proton exchangers in the stimulation of proton efflux by EGF, we isotonically substituted tetramethylammonium for sodium in the BI-1356 extracellular perfusate, thereby removing the extracellular substrate for sodium proton exchangers. Figure 3B shows that EGF stimulated proton efflux inside a medium containing sodium, and that this effect was nearly abolished in medium in which sodium was replaced by TMA. Moreover, 5 M of 5 amiloride , an inhibitor of NHE 1 and NHE 2, attenuated EGF induced proton efflux by nearly 60 . These findings suggest that EGF induced increases in ECAR are on account of NHE 1 or NHE 2 in podocytes. Calmodulin inhibitors, phosphotyrosine inhibitors and Jak2 inhibitors attenuate EGFinduced NHE 1 activity NHE 1 has two CaM binding domains which are essential for its activation by a lot of stimuli , whereas the function of CaM in the regulation of NHE 2 is a lot less certain . Though elevations of intracellular calcium improve the activity of NHE 2 , CaM has been shown to exert tonic inhibition on NHE 2 . To figure out regardless of whether CaM is involved in EGF induced increases in ECAR, we analyzed
No comments:
Post a Comment